What Vektor does
- RESEARCH
- CONSTRUCT
- REVIEW
- APPROVE
- ALLOCATE
- RECORD
Vektor performs the systematic work. The investment professional retains human approval and ownership of the outcome.
See what Vektor doesSystematic listed equity portfolio management — for boutique DPMs, independent wealth managers, and family offices across Singapore, the UK, Switzerland, Hong Kong, and the UAE.
You studied for years to get your CFA.
Your tools made you an expert in VLOOKUP.
Systematic portfolio-management infrastructure for professional wealth teams. Research, portfolio construction, human approval, allocation and decision records in one inspectable workflow.
Vektor is the systematic portfolio platform you wish you had, instead of wasting your time on spreadsheets.
Who it is for
- Boutique DPMs
- Independent wealth managers
- Family offices managing listed-equity mandates
Vektor is not a direct-to-consumer product, autonomous trading system or generic reporting tool.
See whether Vektor fits your firmTrust is earned through evidence.
Vektor makes its methodology, research and supporting documentation available for inspection, with access appropriate to the material.
Inspect the evidence. Understand the limitations. Decide for yourself.
Not staged
Three markets. One session. Real output.
SGX, LSE, and NASDAQ, run simultaneously — 21 May 2026. Not a mockup, not three separate demos stitched together.
09:14 SGT
SGX
Chen SGP Growth mandate, 5 active positions — 98.94% capital allocation efficiency (100-share board lots)
09:14 SGT
NASDAQ
Same session, single-share-lot mandate — 99.97% efficiency, no board-lot residual
09:15 SGT
LSE
GBP mandate, 10 instruments — indicator assigned per stock by grid search
Asset Allocation · Steps 07–08
Allocation at current market prices with lot-size rounding — SGX (board lots)
SGD 469,948 of SGD 475,000 available capital deployed — 98.94% efficiency. Every figure on this screen is auditable and reproducible.
2-level validation — grid search + independent ML re-check
11 steps screening to funded position
- WORKING Eleven-step portfolio management workflow
Working means built and run end to end on real market data. Live means running in a client account: not yet.
Not this · yet
Not a live track record.
No. We're telling you before you ask: IBKR integration is built and validated through paper trading — live execution begins with the first Proof Partner's first production period. Full detail on what's validated and what go-live requires: What Vektor Is Not →
Reference outputSee the output
The Thinking · Vektor by InvestPuppy
We may have named our company after a Puppy, but we try not to treat you like a child.
Clear answers. Direct access. No sales theatre.
We thought of the name, then dismissed it as not serious. We spent several days considering very serious, professional-sounding alternatives. They were entirely forgettable. A week later, InvestPuppy was the one name we still remembered, and the one we could not quite argue away.
One founder loved it immediately. The other spent a week looking for something more professional, more conventional and, as it turned out, more forgettable. Nothing stuck. InvestPuppy did.
We kept it because the investment industry has no shortage of firms that look and sound the part. We were more interested in building something that performed it.
InvestPuppy is the deliberately unconventional maker. Vektor is the institutional platform that conviction produced.
You already know the problems we’re about to describe.
You’ve managed around them, worked with them, built workarounds for them. Some of them you’ve stopped noticing because they’ve been there long enough to feel permanent.
We were in the room. Sometimes as consultants. Sometimes embedded deeper than that. Always close enough to see the same pattern repeat across hundreds of teams.
What we kept seeing
Brilliant people. Serious mandates. A laptop open to a spreadsheet doing work it was never designed to do. Nobody said anything. Everyone knew.
The alternative was a Bloomberg Terminal at USD 31,980 a seat and a PORT add-on at USD 8,000 more — built for operations teams that boutique DPMs don’t have and can’t justify. The institutional tools existed. The institutional price tag came with them.
The spreadsheet ceiling wasn’t laziness. It was arithmetic.
The thing that stayed with us longest: a portfolio manager who couldn’t show a client why their mandate held a position. Not because they didn’t know — they did. Because the decision trail lived in a spreadsheet that had been overwritten three saves ago.
Not a disaster. Just the slow friction of tools used past their limit.
At some point you stop watching and start writing things down. That’s where Unvarnished started — thirteen papers about what we saw, written before we built a single line of Vektor code. Not to criticise the industry. Because we believe a vendor that won’t name the problem honestly has no business claiming to solve it.
Our Better Way is what we did about it.
Neither series sells Vektor. They explain why it exists.
It’s probably the most honest thing on the site.
If that’s the kind of thinking you want from a platform vendor — read on.
If not, here are some links to our competitors.
The industry’s favourite funeral: the expert whose real tool was a spreadsheet. See the evidence →
Choose how deep to go
The short version
A concise overview of the product, audience and workflow
Read Vektor at a GlanceStructured evaluation
Test the proposition, evidence, fit, controls and technology
Evaluate VektorYour mandate
See what Vektor produces from a listed-equity mandate
Show us a mandate
