Will it fit our firm?

Short answer

Vektor fits listed-equity mandates run systematically, delivered in the way that matches how your operation sits.

Boutique suits boutique discretionary managers, independent wealth managers and family office principals. House suits institutional desks that need formal governance and an institutional SLA. Wrapped suits custodian banks and wealth platforms that license the platform under their own brand.

Eight exchanges are configured, and SGX, LSE and NASDAQ were run in one session on 21 May 2026.

Boutique is the model working end to end today. House and Wrapped are built to different degrees, and what is not yet in place is listed below.

What we can show

• Eight exchanges configured. New markets take minutes, not projects. Different market. Same workflow. Same evidence.
• Boutique is direct with InvestPuppy and self-service. House is direct and co-designed, with no fixed timeline. Wrapped is licensed through a custodian bank or wealth platform, which keeps the client relationship, so clients never see InvestPuppy.
• Data residency options: Singapore (current), UK, Switzerland, Hong Kong and UAE. Regional deployment is specified at subscription and written into the Data Processing Agreement.
• Multi-currency: one configured-source FX observation per configured currency pair at 8 AM SGT each market day, currency-adjusted valuation at position level, and a supported base currency per client.
• Bloomberg stays for price monitoring, news and corporate-action alerts, client reporting, fixed income and compliance screening. Vektor replaces universe screening, portfolio optimisation, indicator selection and allocation calculation.
• Pricing is by assets under management and is published on the pricing page.

What this means

Fit is mostly a question of operating model, not market coverage. Vektor replaces the Excel-based or Bloomberg-screen-based construction workflow that sits alongside your data and reporting, and leaves the rest.

Vektor is portfolio-management software, not a licence substitute. The regulated firm still owns the client relationship, the investment decisions and the associated obligations. The application of local rules depends on jurisdiction and delivery model, which is why we confirm the position before operating in a market rather than assuming it afterwards.

The less we know, the safer everyone is. In some deployment models, client identity never enters the Vektor platform at all. The platform operates on the minimum information required to support the workflow, while client identity remains with the institution that owns the relationship. The legal, regulatory and contractual consequences depend on the final deployment model and jurisdiction.

What remains unproven

• Vektor has no live track record, and the platform has not yet executed in a live account. “Typically live in days” for standard clients depends on onboarding templates not yet validated in live use.
• House: the architecture is built and working at Boutique scale. The institutional configuration is built with a partner, one Alloy Partner at a time. Maker/checker access control, external PMS integration and the hybrid identity vault are not yet in place, and institutional SLA terms are agreed later in the engagement.
• Wrapped: a read-side prototype works in development. The write side is specified, not built.
• Corporate actions are not processed automatically.
• Vektor is not a regulated product. The regulatory position for your firm depends on jurisdiction and delivery model, and is confirmed before operating in a market.
• Fixed income and alternatives mandates are untested. Enquire anyway and we will say where we stand.